Sticky Work: "Good" Feminist Subjects and their “Survivor-Led” Politics
Description
Sticky Work: "Good" Feminist Subjects and their "Survivor-Led" Politics
Increasingly, sexual violence scholarship, activism and sector-work emphasises the importance of "survivor-led" or survivor-centred responses to sexual violence. Such responses have emerged as a necessary correction to the historical and ongoing exclusion and silencing of survivor's voices, and to redress the attendant harms caused to many survivors as a result.
However, important questions remain regarding which survivors are able to speak and be heard, and what survivor speech 'does'. In this seminar event, we examine the politics of "survivor-led" responses, and the ways in which these may become both challenging to critique, and bound up in punitive, carceral responses to sexual violence.
Please join us for this free event with Dr molly ackhurst from the University of Greenwich, UK. Dr ackhurst will present her work on "good" feminist subjects and "survivor-led" politics, with Dr Tully O'Neill (LaTrobe University), Jess Oldfield (LaTrobe University/University of Melbourne) and A/Prof Bianca Fileborn (University of Melbourne) acting as discussants, followed by an audience Q&A.
The event will be held in-person at the University of Melbourne Parkville campus, with a Zoom option also available. Location and zoom link details will be emailed to attendees closer to the event date.
This event is free, but registrations are essential.
Sticky Work: "Good" Feminist Subjects and their “Survivor-Led” Politics (full abstract)
Dr molly ackhurst
This paper interrogates the ways in which feminism has become attached to a type of work and politics which is “survivor-led” due to the affective figure of the innocent wounded survivor (ackhurst, 2025). Being “survivor-led” is understood here as a type of work or politics that is moved to follow “the survivor’s” wishes without question or critique so that survivors everywhere are better able to “take back control” (Phipps, 2020: 77–78; see also Westmarland and Alderson, 2013). As I will contend, feminism’s wounded figure has produced an (often latently) punitive listening public which is experienced as being distinctly feminist in nature.
The paper begins with my memories of interviewing Parker – a homeless, queer survivor of sexual violence. Through these reflections I explore the ways in which I felt moved to a desire for punishment due to the same “survivor-led” politics that the paper both explores and critiques. An urge I argue to be due to my own affectedness by the figure of the wounded survivor and also by a related need to be a “good feminist” by giving those who embody this wounded figure whatever they want. Through engagement with empirical data I go on to explore the ways in which an attachment to a “survivor-led” way of working reverberates across Anglophone feminist work more broadly. Central to this “led-by” politics is a powerful, affective, carceral core narrative: that “because some survivors say they want carceral outcomes these mustn’t be abandoned”. In illustrating the force of this politics I show that being not only has being “led-by” survivors has become a foundational part of the feminist “we” and it’s “good” ear (Ahmed, 2017) but so too has an often-complicated attachment to this core narrative. I make sense of this through engagement with Sara Ahmed (2000), who contends important questions must be asked of the dwelling place feminism frequently finds itself within, and the operation of the “we” within it.
In exploring the risks of this politics the paper contends that, while the survivor-led “we” appears rooted in a solidarity with survivor speech, it in fact frequently morphs into what Henrique Carvalho and Anastasia Chamberlen (2021) refer to as ‘hostile solidarity’. This being a type of solidarity that is enforced through the punishment of others. For those I interviewed this hostility was often directed at perpetrators, however there are further consequences of this hostility when innocence ruptures. The paper concludes by considering what it may require to reorient to survivors and their speech, arguing it is essential to focus on facilitating life in a bearable way rather than solution-proffering to alleviate the awfulness of sexual violence.
Lineup
Dr molly ackhurst
Dr. Molly Ackhurst is a Senior Lecturer in Criminology at the University of Greenwich. With over a decade of experience in a host of roles within the English frontline sexual violence sector, molly is also a central and active figure in the field of British abolitionist feminist scholarship. Her current research focus is the affective dimensions of contemporary Anglophone feminist sexual violence politics.
Dr Tully O'Neill
Dr Tully O’Neill is a Senior Lecturer in Criminology at La Trobe University whose research examines sexual and gender-based violence, digital technologies, and justice. They are the author of Disclosing Sexual Violence in a Digital Society: Storytelling, Activism, Justice (Springer, 2024). Their current research examines the role of public survivors in the post-#MeToo era.
Jessica Oldfield
Jessica Oldfield is a Research Officer at the Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society at La Trobe University. Her research explores the intersections of sexual harm, feminism, and popular culture, with a strong commitment to centring the voices and perspectives of victim-survivors. Her PhD research examined how victim-survivors navigate voice, silence, and anonymity in the post-#MeToo era.
A/Prof Bianca Fileborn
Bianca is an Associate Professor in Criminology, School of Social & Political Sciences, University of Melbourne. Their research examines victim-centered and innovative justice responses to street harassment, and the ways in which sexual violence is shaped through the entanglement of social/cultural, structural, and material factors. They are the author of Reclaiming the Night-Time Economy, Unwanted Sexual Attention in Pubs and Clubs, co-author of Unsilenced: Women Musicians, Gender-Based Violence and the Popular Music Industry, and co-editor of #MeToo and the Politics of Social Change.
Tickets for good, not greed Humanitix dedicates 100% of profits from booking fees to charity