Appropriate RPL Practices: From Resource Development To Implementation
Description
RPL is one of the most audited, most misunderstood pathways in the sector — not because assessors don’t understand the concept, but because the systems underneath it (resources, mapping, evidence requirements) are rarely built with RPL in mind from the start. This first session in a two-part series looks at what “appropriate” RPL practice actually requires, from how you design and adapt assessment resources for RPL candidates through to how that translates into consistent, defensible decisions in practice.
Key Topics
· Designing (and adapting) resources that genuinely support RPL, not just repurposed cluster assessments
· Evidence requirements for RPL: what’s sufficient, what’s not, and how to document the gap
· Building assessor confidence and consistency in RPL judgement
· Common audit findings in RPL and the practice gaps behind them
· From policy to practice: embedding RPL-ready processes across your training products
Lineup

Jack Murray
Jack Murray is a seasoned compliance consultant with over a decade of experience in Australia's vocational education and training (VET) sector. Currently serving as Assistant Director - Compliance with VETNexus, Jack specialises in helping RTOs achieve and maintain regulatory compliance while improving the quality of their training and assessment. His expertise spans the 2025 Standards for RTOs, the VET Quality Framework, ESOS Act 2000, National Code 2018, and state-government funding programs. Jack's practical approach combines deep regulatory knowledge with hands-on experience in RTO operations. Jack brings both technical expertise and real-world insight to every engagement. He has supported numerous RTOs through initial registration, audit preparation, rectification activities, and continuous improvement initiatives.
Tickets for good, not greed Humanitix dedicates 100% of profits from booking fees to charity












